Over the past few years Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg has had more than a few inappropriate gaffs. These seem to be getting worse, and more importantly they are quite ill timed if Facebook plans an IPO. It was reported back in 2010 that Zuckerberg thought Facebook users were dumb fucks. More recently, Zuckerberg would love to get information about, and advertise to, tweens. This is somewhat disturbing because below a certain age children do not necessarily understand the difference between reality and advertisement. Then most recently, Zuckerberg just prays on our collective short-term memory to forget things such as privacy issues. Regardless of how he personally feels, as the public face to an extraordinary influential company he should probably not be saying these things.
With skill, and I imagine a lot of luck, Zuckerberg created Facebook into the social media beast it is today. However, running a large multi-billion dollar international entity is a bit different than creating a startup. When venture capitalists or angel fund investors fork over money to startups, they typically want a seat at the table, usually in the form of a board seat (arguments about fiduciary conflicts aside). When serious money is changing hands, it would not be unheard of for the VCs to request an experienced Chief Executive to take the helm, for example Eric Schmidt at Google. They want to make certain that their investment is going to give them a nice healthy return. The behavior of the entrepreneur needs to be appropriate for the situation.
Without a doubt, I imagine Zuckerberg has oodles of talented and experienced folks managing the Facebook Empire (not to mention his technical wizardry). It is not a question of technical competency. It is a question of public relations. This is a guy whose business cards formerly read, “I’m CEO. . .bitch!”
Zuckerberg may have been the best fit to run Facebook, The Startup but is he the best fit to be CEO of Facebook, The Billion Dollar Global Giant?
The Point: Managing a startup is not the same as managing a large public company. Is it prudent for a successful entrepreneur like Zuckerberg to step aside, if only temporary (e.g. Larry Page of Google), and allow a seasoned CEO to take the company public? Is the CEO’s role more of a political position than managerial?
Let’s Connect